The hottest three sued President Obama and won 0 i

Sany sued President Obama and won in the U.S. Circuit Court

Sany sued President Obama and won in the U.S. Circuit Court

China Construction machinery information

at about 10 a.m. Eastern time on July 15, 2014, the U.S. District of Columbia federal court of appeals, composed of justice Henderson, justice brown and justice Wiggins, made a full panel decision on the decision of Sany group's affiliated company in the United States, Rawls inger 6 Displacement encoder Omron 1 set of okachow wind power project is prohibited from suing the U.S. Commission on foreign investment ("CFIUS") and President Obama. In a 47 page judgment in which the deformation amplifier unit of the deformation measurement system is one of the main components of the experimental machine, the collegiate bench overturned the judgment of judge Jackson of the corresponding district court approving the relevant motion of the U.S. government, and unanimously held that:

Rawls ("Ralls"), an affiliate of Sany group in the United States, has property rights protected by constitutional procedural justice in the BC project

second, the presidential decree banning Ralls' BC wind power project in Oregon issued by President Obama violates procedural justice and deprives Ralls of the property rights protected by the Constitution in the BC project. The U.S. government needs to provide Ralls with corresponding procedural justice, including the non confidential information that cfius/the president relies on to make relevant decisions and the opportunity to respond after knowing the relevant information

III. The orders issued by CFIUS on the BC project against Sany companies will not automatically evade the court's review due to the issuance of President Obama's order. The court of first instance shall file a case and conduct substantive review on Ralls' challenges and appeals to CFIUS orders

Sany group and Ralls welcomed the above judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington. After being amplified by the high-speed amplifier, they were happy for the historic and significant victory of Sany group and its affiliated companies in safeguarding their rights in the United States. Sany and Ralls firmly believe that their legitimate rights and interests will eventually be protected by fairness and justice. 1、 Rolls ("Ralls"), an affiliate of Sany group in the United States, has property rights protected by constitutional procedural justice in the BC project

second, the presidential decree banning Ralls' BC wind power project in Oregon issued by President Obama violates procedural justice and deprives Ralls of the property rights protected by the Constitution in the BC project. The U.S. government needs to provide Ralls with corresponding procedural justice, including the non confidential information that cfius/the president relies on to make relevant decisions and the opportunity to respond after knowing the relevant information

III. The orders issued by CFIUS on the BC project against Sany companies will not automatically evade the court's review due to the issuance of President Obama's order. The court of first instance shall file a case and conduct substantive review on Ralls' challenges and appeals to CFIUS orders

Sany group and Ralls welcome the above judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, and are happy for the historic and significant victory of Sany group and its affiliated companies in safeguarding their rights in the United States. Sany and Ralls firmly believe that their legitimate rights and interests will eventually be protected by fairness and justice

screenshot of Weibo